Example of profit reconciliation
of Marginal and Absorption Costing
In below example the basic concept of the marginal costing
is being clarified and therefore there is no element of inventory is included
in the following example.
Sales Price
|
50 per unit
|
Material Direct
|
20 -unit
|
Labor Direct
|
10 - per unit
|
Expenses
|
5 per unit
|
Rent of Factory
|
20,000
|
Lightning Factory
|
20,000
|
Unit produced
|
15,000 units
|
Unit Sold
|
10,000 units
|
Calculated profit under Marginal Costing and Absorption costing and reconcile the profit
Solution
If the stock level increases it means that absorption profit
would be more than marginal cost to the extent amount stored in closing stock
in respect of fixed overheads. Similarly if the stock level decrease then profit
under marginal costing would be greater than absorption costing.
1. Marginal Costing
|
Units
|
Rate
|
Total
|
Sales
|
10,000
|
50
|
500,000
|
Less: Variable Cost
|
10,000
|
(20+10+5)=35
|
(350,000)
|
Contribution
|
|
|
150,000
|
Less: Fixed Cost
|
|
(20,000+20,000)
|
(40,000)
|
Profit
|
|
|
110,000
|
2. Absorption Costing
|
Units
|
Rate
|
Total
|
Total
|
Sales
|
10,000
|
50
|
|
500,000
|
Production Cost
|
15,000
|
(20+10+5)=35
|
525,000
|
|
Fixed Cost
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
Less Closing Stock
|
5,000
|
37.667
|
(188,333)
|
|
Cost of Sales
|
|
|
|
(376,667)
|
Profit
|
|
|
|
123,333
|
3. Profit Reconciliation
Marginal Costing Profit
|
110,000
|
Absorption Costing Profit
|
123,333
|
Difference
|
13,333
|
|
|
We see that closing stock level is increased during the year
as there was no opening stock therefore the profit amount under absorption
costing is more than marginal cost. This amount is exactly the same amount
which was charged to closing inventory in absorption costing in respect of
fixed overheads.
4. Stock valuation
for fixed overheads
Fixed overhead
|
40,000
|
Number of unit produced
|
15,000
|
Unit Fixed overhead cost
|
=40,000/15,000 = 2.666
|
Stock over valued
|
5000 unit X 2.666 = 13,333
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment