Showing posts with label examples. Show all posts
Showing posts with label examples. Show all posts

Wednesday, 19 November 2014

Example of make and buy decision limited resource


Example of make and buy decision limited resource



 Product A
Product B
Product C
Sale price
 100
120
140
Variable Cost
 80
100
100
Hours per unit
3
2
3
Unit to produced
4000 Unit
4000 Units
4000 Units
Supplier offer
90
110
120
Available machine hours

15,000


Should Farhan and company buy or make the product

Solution


1. Cost per hour saved by making


A
B
C
Variable cost Making
80
100
100
Variable cost buying
90
110
120
Variable over buying
10
10
20
Machine hour saved
3
2
3
Cost per hour saved
3.33
5
6.667


2. Make and buy mix

PRODUCT
UNITS
HOUR PER UNIT
TOTAL HR
UNIT RATE
AMOUNT
C
4000
3
12,000
100
400,000
B
1500
2
3,000
100
150,000





550,000

2,500


110
275,000
A
4000


90
360,000





635,000





1,185,000


Examples of Make or buy Decision



Make or Buy Decision



 Product A
Product B
Sale price
 100
120
Variable Cost
 80
100
Incremental Fixed cost
8000
5000
Unit to produced
5000 unit
5000 units
Supplier offer
90
90



Suggest company should buy or make the products.

Solution


1. Cost can be saved on making product


  Product A
Product B
Variable Cost of making
80
100
units
5000
5000
Variable cost saved
40,000
50,000
Incremental fixed cost
8,000
5,000

48,000
55,000

2. Cost will be required to buy


  Product A
Product B
Variable Cost of making
90
100
units
5000
5000
Variable cost of buying
45,000
45,000

3. Differential Cost


  Product A
Product B
Cost of making Saved
(48,000)
(55,000)
Cost of buying
45000
45000
Variable cost of buying
(3,000)
(10,000)

Both products should be sub contracted because the cost offered by the supplier is less than cost saved by not making the product.

 If cost of supplier would be more than cost saved by not making the product then it would be a making case.

Example of further processing Decision


Example of further processing Decision

The basic rule for further processing decision is that when sale value minus further processing cost is more than sale value at split point then product is to be further processed.

Sale value at split point
100
Further processing cost
 40
Sale value at finished stage
150
Units produced
100



Solution


Sale value
150
Less: further processing cost
40

110
Sale value at split point
100
Decision
Further processing is feasible as per rule
Extra contribution per unit process
10
Total contribution
100 units x 10 = 1000

Wednesday, 12 November 2014

Allocation Example

Allocation Example





Example 1



Items
Production
Maintenance
Consumable
10,000
5000
Factory Rent
         60,000

Electricity
         80,000

Fuel (Liters)
4000
800
Area Sq Feet
1200
800
Fuel Rate $ 10


Solution

Items
Bases
Total
Production Department
Maintenance Department
Consumable material
Direct
              15,000
10,000
5,000
Fuel
Direct
              48,000
40,000
8,000
Factory Rent
Area
              60,000
36,000
24,000
Electricity
Area
              80,000
48,000
32,000







           203,000
134,000
69,000